You are viewing this page in an unauthorized frame window.
This is a potential security issue, you are being redirected to
https://nvd.nist.gov
An official website of the United States government
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
This CVE record has recently been published to the CVE List and has been included within the NVD dataset.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
super: fix emergency thaw deadlock on frozen block devices
do_thaw_all_callback() calls bdev_thaw() while holding sb->s_umount
exclusively. If the block device was frozen via bdev_freeze() dropping
the last block layer freeze reference calls fs_bdev_thaw() which
reacquires s_umount:
do_thaw_all_callback(sb)
super_lock_excl(sb) # holds sb->s_umount
bdev_thaw(sb->s_bdev)
mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex)
# bd_fsfreeze_count drops 1 -> 0
bd_holder_ops->thaw == fs_bdev_thaw
get_bdev_super(bdev)
bdev_super_lock(bdev, true)
super_lock(sb, true)
down_write(&sb->s_umount) # same task: deadlock
The emergency thaw worker deadlocks against itself holding both
s_umount and bd_fsfreeze_mutex. That fscks any subsequent unmount,
freeze, or thaw of that filesystem and block device.
[ 81.878470] sysrq: Show Blocked State
[ 81.880140] task:kworker/0:1 state:D stack:0 pid:11 tgid:11 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00080000
[ 81.884876] Workqueue: events do_thaw_all
[ 81.886656] Call Trace:
[ 81.887759] <TASK>
[ 81.888763] __schedule+0x579/0x1420
[ 81.890372] schedule+0x3a/0x100
[ 81.891794] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30
[ 81.893848] rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x1ea/0x900
[ 81.895191] ? __pfx_do_thaw_all_callback+0x10/0x10
[ 81.896528] down_write+0xbd/0xc0
[ 81.897505] super_lock+0x91/0x180
[ 81.898457] ? __mutex_lock+0xa99/0x1140
[ 81.900748] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x1f/0x400
[ 81.902069] bdev_super_lock+0x5b/0x150
[ 81.903132] get_bdev_super+0x10/0x60
[ 81.904042] fs_bdev_thaw+0x23/0xf0
[ 81.904755] bdev_thaw+0x82/0x100
[ 81.905484] do_thaw_all_callback+0x2c/0x50
[ 81.906298] __iterate_supers+0x5d/0x130
[ 81.907067] do_thaw_all+0x20/0x40
[ 81.907739] process_one_work+0x206/0x5e0
[ 81.908545] worker_thread+0x1e2/0x3c0
[ 81.909339] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 81.910171] kthread+0xf4/0x130
[ 81.910799] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 81.911528] ret_from_fork+0x2e2/0x3b0
[ 81.912259] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 81.913010] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 81.913806] </TASK>
bdev_super_lock() even documents the violated requirement with
lockdep_assert_not_held(&sb->s_umount).
Acquiring bd_fsfreeze_mutex under s_umount also inverts the
bd_fsfreeze_mutex vs. s_umount ordering established by
bdev_{freeze,thaw}() and can thus ABBA against a concurrent block-layer
freeze even when the recursive path isn't hit.
Fix this by not holding s_umount around the bdev_thaw() loop at all. Pin
the superblock with an active reference instead as
filesystems_freeze_callback() does. The active reference keeps the
superblock from being shut down and so ->s_bdev stays valid without
holding s_umount. The block-layer-held freeze is dropped by
fs_bdev_thaw() with FREEZE_MAY_NEST | FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE exactly as
a regular unfreeze would and thaw_super_locked() handles
filesystem-level freezes as before.
The emergency thaw path has deadlocked like this in one form or
another for a long long time but the current exclusively-held
shape dates back to commit [1] where thaw_bdev() already ended in
thaw_super() with s_umount held by do_thaw_all_callback().
Metrics
NVD enrichment efforts reference publicly available information to associate
vector strings. CVSS information contributed by other sources is also
displayed.
By selecting these links, you will be leaving NIST webspace.
We have provided these links to other web sites because they
may have information that would be of interest to you. No
inferences should be drawn on account of other sites being
referenced, or not, from this page. There may be other web
sites that are more appropriate for your purpose. NIST does
not necessarily endorse the views expressed, or concur with
the facts presented on these sites. Further, NIST does not
endorse any commercial products that may be mentioned on
these sites. Please address comments about this page to [email protected].