Search Results (Refine Search)
- Keyword (text search): cpe:2.3:a:octopus:octopus_deploy:1.4.0.1589:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- CPE Name Search: true
Vuln ID | Summary | CVSS Severity |
---|---|---|
CVE-2022-23184 |
In affected Octopus Server versions when the server HTTP and HTTPS bindings are configured to localhost, Octopus Server will allow open redirects. Published: February 06, 2022; 10:15:07 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 6.1 MEDIUM V2.0: 5.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2021-26556 |
When Octopus Server is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. Published: October 06, 2021; 9:15:07 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.8 HIGH V2.0: 4.4 MEDIUM |
CVE-2020-12286 |
In Octopus Deploy before 2019.12.9 and 2020 before 2020.1.12, the TaskView permission is not scoped to any dimension. For example, a scoped user who is scoped to only one tenant can view server tasks scoped to any other tenant. Published: April 28, 2020; 3:15:12 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 4.3 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2020-10678 |
In Octopus Deploy before 2020.1.5, for customers running on-premises Active Directory linked to their Octopus server, an authenticated user can leverage a bug to escalate privileges. Published: March 19, 2020; 11:15:13 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 8.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.5 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-8944 |
An Information Exposure issue in the Terraform deployment step in Octopus Deploy before 2019.1.8 (and before 2018.10.4 LTS) allows remote authenticated users to view sensitive Terraform output variables via log files. Published: February 19, 2019; 10:29:00 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2018-10550 |
In Octopus Deploy before 2018.4.7, target and tenant tag variable scopes were not checked against the list of tenants the user has access to. Published: April 30, 2018; 12:29:00 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2018-5706 |
An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy before 4.1.9. Any user with user editing permissions can modify teams to give themselves Administer System permissions even if they didn't have them, as demonstrated by use of the RoleEdit or TeamEdit permission. Published: January 16, 2018; 5:29:00 AM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 8.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.5 MEDIUM |
CVE-2017-17665 |
In Octopus Deploy before 4.1.3, the machine update process doesn't check that the user has access to all environments. This allows an access-control bypass because the set of environments to which a machine is scoped may include environments in which the user lacks access. Published: December 13, 2017; 3:29:00 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 8.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.5 MEDIUM |
CVE-2017-15611 |
In Octopus before 3.17.7, an authenticated user who was explicitly granted the permission to invite new users (aka UserInvite) can invite users to teams with escalated privileges. Published: October 19, 2017; 4:29:00 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2017-15610 |
An issue was discovered in Octopus before 3.17.7. When the special Guest user account is granted the CertificateExportPrivateKey permission, and Guest Access is enabled for the Octopus Server, an attacker can sign in as the Guest account and export Certificates managed by Octopus, including the private key. Published: October 19, 2017; 4:29:00 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2017-15609 |
Octopus before 3.17.7 allows attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information by reading a variable JSON file in certain situations involving Offline Drop Targets. Published: October 19, 2017; 4:29:00 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |