Search Results (Refine Search)
- Results Type: Overview
- Keyword (text search): cpe:2.3:o:huawei:openeuler:22.03:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*
- CPE Name Search: true
Vuln ID | Summary | CVSS Severity |
---|---|---|
CVE-2021-33640 |
After tar_close(), libtar.c releases the memory pointed to by pointer t. After tar_close() is called in the list() function, it continues to use pointer t: free_longlink_longname(t->th_buf) . As a result, the released memory is used (use-after-free). Published: December 19, 2022; 11:15:10 AM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2021-33646 |
The th_read() function doesn’t free a variable t->th_buf.gnu_longname after allocating memory, which may cause a memory leak. Published: August 10, 2022; 4:15:20 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2021-33645 |
The th_read() function doesn’t free a variable t->th_buf.gnu_longlink after allocating memory, which may cause a memory leak. Published: August 10, 2022; 4:15:20 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2021-33644 |
An attacker who submits a crafted tar file with size in header struct being 0 may be able to trigger an calling of malloc(0) for a variable gnu_longname, causing an out-of-bounds read. Published: August 10, 2022; 4:15:20 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 8.1 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2021-33643 |
An attacker who submits a crafted tar file with size in header struct being 0 may be able to trigger an calling of malloc(0) for a variable gnu_longlink, causing an out-of-bounds read. Published: August 10, 2022; 4:15:20 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.1 CRITICAL V2.0:(not available) |