CVE-2017-9230 Detail
Modified
This vulnerability has been modified since it was last analyzed by the NVD. It is awaiting reanalysis which may result in further changes to the information provided.
Current Description
** DISPUTED ** The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof-of-Work function execution should be independent. NOTE: a number of persons feel that this methodology is a benign mining optimization, not a vulnerability.
Source:
MITRE
View Analysis Description
Analysis Description
The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof-of-Work function execution should be independent.
Source:
MITRE
Severity
CVSS 3.x Severity and Metrics:
Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.0 Severity and Metrics:
Vector: (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N)
References to Advisories, Solutions, and Tools
By selecting these links, you will be leaving NIST webspace. We have provided these links to other web sites because
they may have information that would be of interest to you. No inferences should be drawn on account of other sites
being referenced, or not, from this page. There may be other web sites that are more appropriate for your purpose.
NIST does not necessarily endorse the views expressed, or concur with the facts presented on these sites. Further,
NIST does not endorse any commercial products that may be mentioned on these sites. Please address comments about
this page to nvd@nist.gov.
Weakness Enumeration
| CWE-ID |
CWE Name |
Source |
| CWE-338 |
Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG) |
NIST
|
Change History
4 change records found
- show changes
CVE Modified by MITRE -
6/13/2018 9:29:31 PM
| Action |
Type |
Old Value |
New Value |
| Changed |
Description |
Record truncated, showing 500 of 656 characters.
View Entire Change Record
The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof- |
Record truncated, showing 500 of 671 characters.
View Entire Change Record
** DISPUTED ** The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and ( |
CVE Modified by MITRE -
6/5/2018 9:29:01 PM
| Action |
Type |
Old Value |
New Value |
| Changed |
Description |
Record truncated, showing 500 of 549 characters.
View Entire Change Record
The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof- |
Record truncated, showing 500 of 656 characters.
View Entire Change Record
The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof- |
Initial Analysis -
6/12/2017 10:46:30 AM
| Action |
Type |
Old Value |
New Value |
| Added |
CPE Configuration |
|
OR
*cpe:2.3:a:bitcoin:bitcoin:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
| Added |
CVSS V2 |
|
(AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) |
| Added |
CVSS V3 |
|
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N |
| Added |
CWE |
|
CWE-338 |
| Changed |
Reference Type |
http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf No Types Assigned |
http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf Technical Description |
| Changed |
Reference Type |
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657 No Types Assigned |
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657 Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry |
| Changed |
Reference Type |
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf No Types Assigned |
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf Technical Description |
| Changed |
Reference Type |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html No Types Assigned |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html Mailing List, Technical Description, Third Party Advisory |
| Changed |
Reference Type |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html No Types Assigned |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
| Changed |
Reference Type |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html No Types Assigned |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
| Changed |
Reference Type |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html No Types Assigned |
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
CVE Modified by MITRE -
5/26/2017 9:29:02 PM
| Action |
Type |
Old Value |
New Value |
| Added |
Reference |
|
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657 [No Types Assigned] |
Quick Info
CVE Dictionary Entry:
CVE-2017-9230
NVD Published Date:
05/24/2017
NVD Last Modified:
06/13/2018
|