You are viewing this page in an unauthorized frame window.
This is a potential security issue, you are being redirected to
https://nvd.nist.gov
An official website of the United States government
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
This CVE record is not being prioritized for NVD enrichment efforts due to resource or other concerns.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/IOV: Fix race between SR-IOV enable/disable and hotplug
Commit 05703271c3cd ("PCI/IOV: Add PCI rescan-remove locking when
enabling/disabling SR-IOV") tried to fix a race between the VF removal
inside sriov_del_vfs() and concurrent hot unplug by taking the PCI
rescan/remove lock in sriov_del_vfs(). Similarly the PCI rescan/remove lock
was also taken in sriov_add_vfs() to protect addition of VFs.
This approach however causes deadlock on trying to remove PFs with SR-IOV
enabled because PFs disable SR-IOV during removal and this removal happens
under the PCI rescan/remove lock. So the original fix had to be reverted.
Instead of taking the PCI rescan/remove lock in sriov_add_vfs() and
sriov_del_vfs(), fix the race that occurs with SR-IOV enable and disable vs
hotplug higher up in the callchain by taking the lock in
sriov_numvfs_store() before calling into the driver's sriov_configure()
callback.
Metrics
NVD enrichment efforts reference publicly available information to associate
vector strings. CVSS information contributed by other sources is also
displayed.
By selecting these links, you will be leaving NIST webspace.
We have provided these links to other web sites because they
may have information that would be of interest to you. No
inferences should be drawn on account of other sites being
referenced, or not, from this page. There may be other web
sites that are more appropriate for your purpose. NIST does
not necessarily endorse the views expressed, or concur with
the facts presented on these sites. Further, NIST does not
endorse any commercial products that may be mentioned on
these sites. Please address comments about this page to [email protected].
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/IOV: Add PCI rescan-remove locking when enabling/disabling SR-IOV
Before disabling SR-IOV via config space accesses to the parent PF,
sriov_disable() first removes the PCI devices representing the VFs.
Since commit 9d16947b7583 ("PCI: Add global pci_lock_rescan_remove()")
such removal operations are serialized against concurrent remove and
rescan using the pci_rescan_remove_lock. No such locking was ever added
in sriov_disable() however. In particular when commit 18f9e9d150fc
("PCI/IOV: Factor out sriov_add_vfs()") factored out the PCI device
removal into sriov_del_vfs() there was still no locking around the
pci_iov_remove_virtfn() calls.
On s390 the lack of serialization in sriov_disable() may cause double
remove and list corruption with the below (amended) trace being observed:
PSW: 0704c00180000000 0000000c914e4b38 (klist_put+56)
GPRS: 000003800313fb48 0000000000000000 0000000100000001 0000000000000001
00000000f9b520a8 0000000000000000 0000000000002fbd 00000000f4cc9480
0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000180692828
00000000818e8000 000003800313fe2c 000003800313fb20 000003800313fad8
#0 [3800313fb20] device_del at c9158ad5c
#1 [3800313fb88] pci_remove_bus_device at c915105ba
#2 [3800313fbd0] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at c9152f198
#3 [3800313fc28] zpci_iov_remove_virtfn at c90fb67c0
#4 [3800313fc60] zpci_bus_remove_device at c90fb6104
#5 [3800313fca0] __zpci_event_availability at c90fb3dca
#6 [3800313fd08] chsc_process_sei_nt0 at c918fe4a2
#7 [3800313fd60] crw_collect_info at c91905822
#8 [3800313fe10] kthread at c90feb390
#9 [3800313fe68] __ret_from_fork at c90f6aa64
#10 [3800313fe98] ret_from_fork at c9194f3f2.
This is because in addition to sriov_disable() removing the VFs, the
platform also generates hot-unplug events for the VFs. This being the
reverse operation to the hotplug events generated by sriov_enable() and
handled via pdev->no_vf_scan. And while the event processing takes
pci_
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/IOV: Fix race between SR-IOV enable/disable and hotplug
Commit 05703271c3cd ("PCI/IOV: Add PCI rescan-remove locking when
enabling/disabling SR-IOV") tried to fix a race between the VF removal
inside sriov_del_vfs() and concurrent hot unplug by taking the PCI
rescan/remove lock in sriov_del_vfs(). Similarly the PCI rescan/remove lock
was also taken in sriov_add_vfs() to protect addition of VFs.
This approach however causes deadlock on trying to remove PFs with SR-IOV
enabled because PFs disable SR-IOV during removal and this removal happens
under the PCI rescan/remove lock. So the original fix had to be reverted.
Instead of taking the PCI rescan/remove lock in sriov_add_vfs() and
sriov_del_vfs(), fix the race that occurs with SR-IOV enable and disable vs
hotplug higher up in the callchain by taking the lock in
sriov_numvfs_store() before calling into the driver's sriov_configure()
callback.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/IOV: Add PCI rescan-remove locking when enabling/disabling SR-IOV
Before disabling SR-IOV via config space accesses to the parent PF,
sriov_disable() first removes the PCI devices representing the VFs.
Since commit 9d16947b7583 ("PCI: Add global pci_lock_rescan_remove()")
such removal operations are serialized against concurrent remove and
rescan using the pci_rescan_remove_lock. No such locking was ever added
in sriov_disable() however. In particular when commit 18f9e9d150fc
("PCI/IOV: Factor out sriov_add_vfs()") factored out the PCI device
removal into sriov_del_vfs() there was still no locking around the
pci_iov_remove_virtfn() calls.
On s390 the lack of serialization in sriov_disable() may cause double
remove and list corruption with the below (amended) trace being observed:
PSW: 0704c00180000000 0000000c914e4b38 (klist_put+56)
GPRS: 000003800313fb48 0000000000000000 0000000100000001 0000000000000001
00000000f9b520a8 0000000000000000 0000000000002fbd 00000000f4cc9480
0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000180692828
00000000818e8000 000003800313fe2c 000003800313fb20 000003800313fad8
#0 [3800313fb20] device_del at c9158ad5c
#1 [3800313fb88] pci_remove_bus_device at c915105ba
#2 [3800313fbd0] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at c9152f198
#3 [3800313fc28] zpci_iov_remove_virtfn at c90fb67c0
#4 [3800313fc60] zpci_bus_remove_device at c90fb6104
#5 [3800313fca0] __zpci_event_availability at c90fb3dca
#6 [3800313fd08] chsc_process_sei_nt0 at c918fe4a2
#7 [3800313fd60] crw_collect_info at c91905822
#8 [3800313fe10] kthread at c90feb390
#9 [3800313fe68] __ret_from_fork at c90f6aa64
#10 [3800313fe98] ret_from_fork at c9194f3f2.
This is because in addition to sriov_disable() removing the VFs, the
platform also generates hot-unplug events for the VFs. This being the
reverse operation to the hotplug events generated by sriov_enable() and
handled via pdev->no_vf_scan. And while the event processing takes
pci_