The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542.

NETGEAR WNR2000v3 devices before 1.1.2.14, WNR2000v4 devices before 1.0.0.66, and WNR2000v5 devices before 1.0.0.42 allow authentication bypass and remote code execution via a buffer overflow that uses a parameter in the administration webapp. The NETGEAR ID is PSV-2016-0261.

Yodl before 3.07.01 has a Buffer Over-read in the queue_push function in queue/queuepush.c.

Directory traversal vulnerability in Contao before 3.2.19, and 3.4.x before 3.4.4 allows remote authenticated "back end" users to view files outside their file mounts or the document root via unspecified vectors.

Foreman since version 1.5 is vulnerable to an incorrect authorization check due to which users with user management permission who are assigned to some organization(s) can do all operations granted by these permissions on all administrator user object outside of their scope, such as editing global admin accounts including changing their passwords.

IBM iNotes 8.5 and 9.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 125976.

IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.5 and 7.6 generates error messages that could reveal sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 125153.

IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.5 and 7.6 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 125152.

An issue was discovered in Exiv2 0.26. When the data structure of the structure ifd is incorrect, the program assigns pValue_ to 0x0, and the value of pValue() is 0x0. TiffImageEntry::doWriteImage will use the value of pValue() to cause a segmentation fault. To exploit this vulnerability, someone must open a crafted tiff file.

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) S44, (2) S5, (3) S_action_fail, (4) S_ptn_update, (5) T113, (6) T114, (7) T115, (8) T117117, (9) T118, (10) T_action_fail, (11) T_ptn_update, (12) textarea, (13) textfield5, or (14) tmLastConfigFileModifiedDate parameter to notification.cgi.

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging an unrestricted quarantine directory.

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows attackers to eavesdrop and tamper with updates by leveraging unencrypted communications with update servers.

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows attackers to write to arbitrary files and consequently execute arbitrary code with root privileges by leveraging failure to validate software updates.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to start an update from an arbitrary source via a crafted request to SProtectLinux/scanoption_set.cgi, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens.

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) T1 or (2) tmLastConfigFileModifiedDate parameter to log_management.cgi.

NetApp OnCommand Unified Manager Core Package 5.x before 5.2.2P1 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via vectors involving error messages.

SQL injection vulnerability in NetApp OnCommand Unified Manager Core Package 5.x before 5.2.2P1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.

CRLF injection vulnerability in the web interface in OpenVPN Access Server 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and consequently conduct session fixation attacks and possibly HTTP response splitting attacks via "%0A" characters in the PATH_INFO to __session_start__/.

SAP Business One for Android 1.2.3 allows remote attackers to conduct XML External Entity (XXE) attacks via crafted XML data in a request to B1iXcellerator/exec/soap/vP.001sap0003.in_WCSX/com.sap.b1i.vplatform.runtime/INB_WS_CALL_SYNC_XPT/INB_WS_CALL_SYNC_XPT.ipo/proc, aka SAP Security Note 2378065.

Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences.