Search Results (Refine Search)
- Results Type: Overview
- Keyword (text search): cpe:2.3:a:apache:traffic_server:8.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- CPE Name Search: true
Vuln ID | Summary | CVSS Severity |
---|---|---|
CVE-2019-9515 |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400 |
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.8 HIGH |
CVE-2019-9514 |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400 |
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.8 HIGH |
CVE-2019-9513 |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400 |
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.8 HIGH |
CVE-2019-9512 |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400 |
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.8 HIGH |
CVE-2019-9511 |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400 |
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.8 HIGH |