Search Results (Refine Search)
- Keyword (text search): cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_local_traffic_manager:13.1.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- CPE Name Search: true
Vuln ID | Summary | CVSS Severity |
---|---|---|
CVE-2019-6667 |
On BIG-IP 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.1.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, and 11.5.1-11.6.5, under certain conditions, TMM may consume excessive resources when processing traffic for a Virtual Server with the FIX (Financial Information eXchange) profile applied. Published: November 27, 2019; 5:15:11 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6666 |
On BIG-IP 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, and 13.1.0-13.1.1.4, the TMM process may produce a core file when an upstream server or cache sends the BIG-IP an invalid age header value. Published: November 27, 2019; 5:15:11 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6663 |
The BIG-IP 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.0.0-14.1.2.2, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5.1, BIG-IQ 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0, and 5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1 configuration utility is vulnerable to Anti DNS Pinning (DNS Rebinding) attack. Published: November 15, 2019; 4:15:11 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6662 |
On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.1.4, sensitive information is logged into the local log files and/or remote logging targets when restjavad processes an invalid request. Users with access to the log files would be able to view that data. Published: November 15, 2019; 4:15:11 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6660 |
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, and 13.1.0-13.1.1, undisclosed HTTP requests may consume excessive amounts of systems resources which may lead to a denial of service. Published: November 15, 2019; 4:15:11 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2018-12207 |
Improper invalidation for page table updates by a virtual guest operating system for multiple Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service of the host system via local access. Published: November 14, 2019; 3:15:11 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.9 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6657 |
On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1, a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also known as the BIG-IP Configuration utility. Published: November 01, 2019; 11:15:11 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 6.1 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6471 |
A race condition which may occur when discarding malformed packets can result in BIND exiting due to a REQUIRE assertion failure in dispatch.c. Versions affected: BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.7, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4-P1, 9.14.0 -> 9.14.2. Also all releases of the BIND 9.13 development branch and version 9.15.0 of the BIND 9.15 development branch and BIND Supported Preview Edition versions 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.7-S1. Published: October 09, 2019; 12:15:17 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.9 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2018-5743 |
By design, BIND is intended to limit the number of TCP clients that can be connected at any given time. The number of allowed connections is a tunable parameter which, if unset, defaults to a conservative value for most servers. Unfortunately, the code which was intended to limit the number of simultaneous connections contained an error which could be exploited to grow the number of simultaneous connections beyond this limit. Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.6, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4, 9.14.0. BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3, and 9.11.5-S5. Versions 9.13.0 -> 9.13.7 of the 9.13 development branch are also affected. Versions prior to BIND 9.9.0 have not been evaluated for vulnerability to CVE-2018-5743. Published: October 09, 2019; 12:15:13 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2018-14880 |
The OSPFv3 parser in tcpdump before 4.9.3 has a buffer over-read in print-ospf6.c:ospf6_print_lshdr(). Published: October 03, 2019; 12:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2018-14468 |
The FRF.16 parser in tcpdump before 4.9.3 has a buffer over-read in print-fr.c:mfr_print(). Published: October 03, 2019; 12:15:11 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6654 |
On versions 14.0.0-14.1.2, 13.0.0-13.1.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5, the BIG-IP system fails to perform Martian Address Filtering (As defined in RFC 1812 section 5.3.7) on the control plane (management interface). This may allow attackers on an adjacent system to force BIG-IP into processing packets with spoofed source addresses. Published: September 25, 2019; 3:15:10 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 4.3 MEDIUM V2.0: 3.3 LOW |
CVE-2019-6651 |
In BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.1-11.6.4, BIG-IQ 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0,5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, the Configuration utility login page may not follow best security practices when handling a malicious request. Published: September 25, 2019; 2:15:13 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.3 MEDIUM V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6649 |
F5 BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to be modified when using non-default ConfigSync settings. Published: September 20, 2019; 4:15:11 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.1 CRITICAL V2.0: 5.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6643 |
On versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, and 11.5.2-11.6.4, an attacker sending specifically crafted DHCPv6 requests through a BIG-IP virtual server configured with a DHCPv6 profile may be able to cause the TMM process to produce a core file. Published: September 04, 2019; 2:15:11 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6647 |
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, when processing authentication attempts for control-plane users MCPD leaks a small amount of memory. Under rare conditions attackers with access to the management interface could eventually deplete memory on the system. Published: September 04, 2019; 1:15:11 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.3 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6644 |
Similar to the issue identified in CVE-2018-12120, on versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, and 12.1.0-12.1.4 BIG-IP will bind a debug nodejs process to all interfaces when invoked. This may expose the process to unauthorized users if the plugin is left in debug mode and the port is accessible. Published: September 04, 2019; 1:15:11 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.4 CRITICAL V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6645 |
On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, FTP traffic passing through a Virtual Server with both an active FTP profile associated and connection mirroring configured may lead to a TMM crash causing the configured HA action to be taken. Published: September 04, 2019; 12:15:10 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-9515 |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.8 HIGH |
CVE-2019-9514 |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.8 HIGH |