Search Results (Refine Search)
- Keyword (text search): cpe:2.3:a:foxitsoftware:phantompdf:6.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
- CPE Name Search: true
Vuln ID | Summary | CVSS Severity |
---|---|---|
CVE-2019-13316 |
This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Calculate actions. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8757. Published: October 04, 2019; 2:15:14 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-13315 |
This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8656. Published: October 04, 2019; 2:15:14 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-5031 |
An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the JavaScript engine of Foxit Software's Foxit PDF Reader, version 9.4.1.16828. A specially crafted PDF document can trigger an out-of-memory condition which isn't handled properly, resulting in arbitrary code execution. An attacker needs to trick the user to open the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. If the browser plugin extension is enabled, visiting a malicious site can also trigger the vulnerability. Published: October 02, 2019; 12:15:14 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 8.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14215 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. The application could crash when calling xfa.event.rest XFA JavaScript due to accessing a wild pointer. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14214 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.10. The application could be exposed to a JavaScript Denial of Service when deleting pages in a document that contains only one page by calling a "t.hidden = true" function. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14213 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. The application could crash due to the repeated release of the signature dictionary during CSG_SignatureF and CPDF_Document destruction. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14212 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. The application could crash when calling certain XFA JavaScript due to the use of, or access to, a NULL pointer without proper validation on the object. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14211 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. The application could crash due to the lack of proper validation of the existence of an object prior to performing operations on that object when executing JavaScript. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14210 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.10. The application could be exposed to Memory Corruption due to the use of an invalid pointer copy, resulting from a destructed string object. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14209 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.10. The application could be exposed to Heap Corruption due to data desynchrony when adding AcroForm. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0: 7.5 HIGH |
CVE-2019-14208 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.10. The application could be exposed to a NULL pointer dereference and crash when getting a PDF object from a document, or parsing a certain portfolio that contains a null dictionary. Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-14207 |
An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.11. The application could crash when calling the clone function due to an endless loop resulting from confusing relationships between a child and parent object (caused by an append error). Published: July 21, 2019; 3:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.0: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6773 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the richValue property of a Field object within AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8272. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6772 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 2019.010.20098. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8231. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6771 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 2019.010.20098. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the value property of a Field object within AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8230. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6770 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the resetForm method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8229. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6769 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8165. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6768 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8164. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6767 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8163. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
CVE-2019-6766 |
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8162. Published: June 03, 2019; 3:29:03 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |