U.S. flag   An official website of the United States government
Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Dot gov) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Search Results (Refine Search)

Search Parameters:
  • Keyword (text search): cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:19.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • CPE Name Search: true
There are 446 matching records.
Displaying matches 401 through 420.
Vuln ID Summary CVSS Severity
CVE-2019-15090

An issue was discovered in drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_dbg.c in the Linux kernel before 5.1.12. In the qedi_dbg_* family of functions, there is an out-of-bounds read.

Published: August 15, 2019; 8:15:11 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 6.7 MEDIUM
V2.0: 4.6 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-12854

Due to incorrect string termination, Squid cachemgr.cgi 4.0 through 4.7 may access unallocated memory. On systems with memory access protections, this can cause the CGI process to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service for all clients using it.

Published: August 15, 2019; 1:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-9518

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:13 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 7.8 HIGH
CVE-2019-9517

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 7.8 HIGH
CVE-2019-9516

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM
V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-9515

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 7.8 HIGH
CVE-2019-9514

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 7.8 HIGH
CVE-2019-9513

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 7.8 HIGH
CVE-2019-9512

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 7.8 HIGH
CVE-2019-9511

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.

Published: August 13, 2019; 5:15:12 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.5 HIGH
V2.0: 7.8 HIGH
CVE-2019-14981

In ImageMagick 7.x before 7.0.8-41 and 6.x before 6.9.10-41, there is a divide-by-zero vulnerability in the MeanShiftImage function. It allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending a crafted file.

Published: August 12, 2019; 7:15:11 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM
V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13454

ImageMagick 7.0.8-54 Q16 allows Division by Zero in RemoveDuplicateLayers in MagickCore/layer.c.

Published: July 09, 2019; 1:15:11 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM
V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13311

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has memory leaks at AcquireMagickMemory because of a wand/mogrify.c error.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM
V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13310

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has memory leaks at AcquireMagickMemory because of an error in MagickWand/mogrify.c.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM
V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13309

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has memory leaks at AcquireMagickMemory because of mishandling the NoSuchImage error in CLIListOperatorImages in MagickWand/operation.c.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM
V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13308

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MagickCore/fourier.c in ComplexImage.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 8.8 HIGH
V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13307

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has a heap-based buffer overflow at MagickCore/statistic.c in EvaluateImages because of mishandling rows.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.8 HIGH
V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13306

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has a stack-based buffer overflow at coders/pnm.c in WritePNMImage because of off-by-one errors.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.8 HIGH
V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13305

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has a stack-based buffer overflow at coders/pnm.c in WritePNMImage because of a misplaced strncpy and an off-by-one error.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.8 HIGH
V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM
CVE-2019-13304

ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has a stack-based buffer overflow at coders/pnm.c in WritePNMImage because of a misplaced assignment.

Published: July 04, 2019; 9:15:10 PM -0400
V4.0:(not available)
V3.1: 7.8 HIGH
V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM