Search Results (Refine Search)
| Vuln ID | Summary | CVSS Severity |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-28588 |
In SpringBootMovie <=1.2 when adding movie names, malicious code can be stored because there are no filtering parameters, resulting in stored XSS. Published: May 03, 2022; 2:15:08 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.4 MEDIUM V2.0: 3.5 LOW |
| CVE-2022-28585 |
EmpireCMS 7.5 has a SQL injection vulnerability in AdClass.php Published: May 03, 2022; 2:15:08 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0: 7.5 HIGH |
| CVE-2021-46440 |
Storing passwords in a recoverable format in the DOCUMENTATION plugin component of Strapi before 3.6.9 and 4.x before 4.1.5 allows an attacker to access a victim's HTTP request, get the victim's cookie, perform a base64 decode on the victim's cookie, and obtain a cleartext password, leading to getting API documentation for further API attacks. Published: May 03, 2022; 2:15:08 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-28505 |
Jfinal_cms 5.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via com.jflyfox.system.log.LogController.java. Published: May 03, 2022; 1:15:07 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.2 HIGH V2.0: 6.5 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-27962 |
Bluecms 1.6 has a SQL injection vulnerability at cooike. Published: May 03, 2022; 1:15:07 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0: 7.5 HIGH |
| CVE-2022-28561 |
There is a stack overflow vulnerability in the /goform/setMacFilterCfg function in the httpd service of Tenda ax12 22.03.01.21_cn router. An attacker can obtain a stable shell through a carefully constructed payload Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:19 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0: 10.0 HIGH |
| CVE-2022-28560 |
There is a stack overflow vulnerability in the goform/fast_setting_wifi_set function in the httpd service of Tenda ac9 15.03.2.21_cn router. An attacker can obtain a stable shell through a carefully constructed payload Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:19 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0: 10.0 HIGH |
| CVE-2022-23400 |
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the IGXMPXMLParser::parseDelimiter functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted PSD file can overflow a stack buffer, which could either lead to denial of service or, depending on the application, to an information leak. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:19 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.1 HIGH V2.0: 5.8 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-22137 |
A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the ioca_mys_rgb_allocate functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted malformed file can lead to an arbitrary free. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:19 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-1473 |
The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:18 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-1434 |
The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:18 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.9 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-1343 |
The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:18 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.3 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.3 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-1292 |
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:18 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0: 10.0 HIGH |
| CVE-2022-0882 |
A bug exists where an attacker can read the kernel log through exposed Zircon kernel addresses without the required capability ZX_RSRC_KIND_ROOT. It is recommended to upgrade the Fuchsia kernel to 4.1.1 or greater. Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:18 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 2.1 LOW |
| CVE-2021-22573 |
The vulnerability is that IDToken verifier does not verify if token is properly signed. Signature verification makes sure that the token's payload comes from valid provider, not from someone else. An attacker can provide a compromised token with custom payload. The token will pass the validation on the client side. We recommend upgrading to version 1.33.3 or above Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:18 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.3 HIGH V2.0: 3.5 LOW |
| CVE-2021-22556 |
The Security Team discovered an integer overflow bug that allows an attacker with code execution to issue memory cache invalidation operations on pages that they don’t own, allowing them to control kernel memory from userspace. We recommend upgrading to kernel version 4.1 or beyond. Published: May 03, 2022; 12:15:18 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.8 HIGH V2.0: 4.6 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-28590 |
A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Pixelimity 1.0 via admin/admin-ajax.php?action=install_theme. Published: May 03, 2022; 10:15:08 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.2 HIGH V2.0: 6.5 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2022-28589 |
A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Pixelimity 1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via the Title field in admin/pages.php?action=add_new Published: May 03, 2022; 10:15:08 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 4.8 MEDIUM V2.0: 3.5 LOW |
| CVE-2022-0916 |
An issue was discovered in Logitech Options. The OAuth 2.0 state parameter was not properly validated. This leaves applications vulnerable to CSRF attacks during authentication and authorization operations. Published: May 03, 2022; 10:15:08 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 8.8 HIGH V2.0: 6.8 MEDIUM |
| CVE-2021-39390 |
Stored XSS in PartKeepr 1.4.0 Edit section in multiple api endpoints via name parameter. Published: May 03, 2022; 9:15:07 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.4 MEDIUM V2.0: 3.5 LOW |