Search Results (Refine Search)
- Keyword (text search): cpe:2.3:a:python:python:2.7.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
- CPE Name Search: true
Vuln ID | Summary | CVSS Severity |
---|---|---|
CVE-2024-6232 |
There is a MEDIUM severity vulnerability affecting CPython. Regular expressions that allowed excessive backtracking during tarfile.TarFile header parsing are vulnerable to ReDoS via specifically-crafted tar archives. Published: September 03, 2024; 9:15:05 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2024-7592 |
There is a LOW severity vulnerability affecting CPython, specifically the 'http.cookies' standard library module. When parsing cookies that contained backslashes for quoted characters in the cookie value, the parser would use an algorithm with quadratic complexity, resulting in excess CPU resources being used while parsing the value. Published: August 19, 2024; 3:15:08 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2023-40217 |
An issue was discovered in Python before 3.8.18, 3.9.x before 3.9.18, 3.10.x before 3.10.13, and 3.11.x before 3.11.5. It primarily affects servers (such as HTTP servers) that use TLS client authentication. If a TLS server-side socket is created, receives data into the socket buffer, and then is closed quickly, there is a brief window where the SSLSocket instance will detect the socket as "not connected" and won't initiate a handshake, but buffered data will still be readable from the socket buffer. This data will not be authenticated if the server-side TLS peer is expecting client certificate authentication, and is indistinguishable from valid TLS stream data. Data is limited in size to the amount that will fit in the buffer. (The TLS connection cannot directly be used for data exfiltration because the vulnerable code path requires that the connection be closed on initialization of the SSLSocket.) Published: August 24, 2023; 9:15:09 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.3 MEDIUM V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2022-48566 |
An issue was discovered in compare_digest in Lib/hmac.py in Python through 3.9.1. Constant-time-defeating optimisations were possible in the accumulator variable in hmac.compare_digest. Published: August 22, 2023; 3:16:32 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.9 MEDIUM V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2022-48565 |
An XML External Entity (XXE) issue was discovered in Python through 3.9.1. The plistlib module no longer accepts entity declarations in XML plist files to avoid XML vulnerabilities. Published: August 22, 2023; 3:16:32 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2022-48564 |
read_ints in plistlib.py in Python through 3.9.1 is vulnerable to a potential DoS attack via CPU and RAM exhaustion when processing malformed Apple Property List files in binary format. Published: August 22, 2023; 3:16:31 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2022-48560 |
A use-after-free exists in Python through 3.9 via heappushpop in heapq. Published: August 22, 2023; 3:16:31 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2023-36632 |
The legacy email.utils.parseaddr function in Python through 3.11.4 allows attackers to trigger "RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object" via a crafted argument. This argument is plausibly an untrusted value from an application's input data that was supposed to contain a name and an e-mail address. NOTE: email.utils.parseaddr is categorized as a Legacy API in the documentation of the Python email package. Applications should instead use the email.parser.BytesParser or email.parser.Parser class. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is that this is neither a vulnerability nor a bug. The email package is intended to have size limits and to throw an exception when limits are exceeded; they were exceeded by the example demonstration code. Published: June 25, 2023; 2:15:09 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2023-27043 |
The email module of Python through 3.11.3 incorrectly parses e-mail addresses that contain a special character. The wrong portion of an RFC2822 header is identified as the value of the addr-spec. In some applications, an attacker can bypass a protection mechanism in which application access is granted only after verifying receipt of e-mail to a specific domain (e.g., only @company.example.com addresses may be used for signup). This occurs in email/_parseaddr.py in recent versions of Python. Published: April 18, 2023; 8:15:07 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.3 MEDIUM V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2023-24329 |
An issue in the urllib.parse component of Python before 3.11.4 allows attackers to bypass blocklisting methods by supplying a URL that starts with blank characters. Published: February 17, 2023; 10:15:12 AM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2022-45061 |
An issue was discovered in Python before 3.11.1. An unnecessary quadratic algorithm exists in one path when processing some inputs to the IDNA (RFC 3490) decoder, such that a crafted, unreasonably long name being presented to the decoder could lead to a CPU denial of service. Hostnames are often supplied by remote servers that could be controlled by a malicious actor; in such a scenario, they could trigger excessive CPU consumption on the client attempting to make use of an attacker-supplied supposed hostname. For example, the attack payload could be placed in the Location header of an HTTP response with status code 302. A fix is planned in 3.11.1, 3.10.9, 3.9.16, 3.8.16, and 3.7.16. Published: November 09, 2022; 2:15:09 AM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0:(not available) |
CVE-2022-26488 |
In Python before 3.10.3 on Windows, local users can gain privileges because the search path is inadequately secured. The installer may allow a local attacker to add user-writable directories to the system search path. To exploit, an administrator must have installed Python for all users and enabled PATH entries. A non-administrative user can trigger a repair that incorrectly adds user-writable paths into PATH, enabling search-path hijacking of other users and system services. This affects Python (CPython) through 3.7.12, 3.8.x through 3.8.12, 3.9.x through 3.9.10, and 3.10.x through 3.10.2. Published: March 10, 2022; 12:47:45 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.0 HIGH V2.0: 4.4 MEDIUM |
CVE-2021-3733 |
There's a flaw in urllib's AbstractBasicAuthHandler class. An attacker who controls a malicious HTTP server that an HTTP client (such as web browser) connects to, could trigger a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDOS) during an authentication request with a specially crafted payload that is sent by the server to the client. The greatest threat that this flaw poses is to application availability. Published: March 10, 2022; 12:42:59 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 6.5 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2022-0391 |
A flaw was found in Python, specifically within the urllib.parse module. This module helps break Uniform Resource Locator (URL) strings into components. The issue involves how the urlparse method does not sanitize input and allows characters like '\r' and '\n' in the URL path. This flaw allows an attacker to input a crafted URL, leading to injection attacks. This flaw affects Python versions prior to 3.10.0b1, 3.9.5, 3.8.11, 3.7.11 and 3.6.14. Published: February 09, 2022; 6:15:16 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2021-3426 |
There's a flaw in Python 3's pydoc. A local or adjacent attacker who discovers or is able to convince another local or adjacent user to start a pydoc server could access the server and use it to disclose sensitive information belonging to the other user that they would not normally be able to access. The highest risk of this flaw is to data confidentiality. This flaw affects Python versions before 3.8.9, Python versions before 3.9.3 and Python versions before 3.10.0a7. Published: May 20, 2021; 9:15:07 AM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.7 MEDIUM V2.0: 2.7 LOW |
CVE-2021-28667 |
StackStorm before 3.4.1, in some situations, has an infinite loop that consumes all available memory and disk space. This can occur if Python 3.x is used, the locale is not utf-8, and there is an attempt to log Unicode data (from an action or rule name). Published: March 17, 2021; 11:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 7.1 HIGH |
CVE-2021-23336 |
The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9.0 and before 3.9.2 are vulnerable to Web Cache Poisoning via urllib.parse.parse_qsl and urllib.parse.parse_qs by using a vector called parameter cloaking. When the attacker can separate query parameters using a semicolon (;), they can cause a difference in the interpretation of the request between the proxy (running with default configuration) and the server. This can result in malicious requests being cached as completely safe ones, as the proxy would usually not see the semicolon as a separator, and therefore would not include it in a cache key of an unkeyed parameter. Published: February 15, 2021; 8:15:12 AM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 5.9 MEDIUM V2.0: 4.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2013-1753 |
The gzip_decode function in the xmlrpc client library in Python 3.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted HTTP request. Published: March 11, 2020; 1:15:12 PM -0400 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |
CVE-2014-4650 |
The CGIHTTPServer module in Python 2.7.5 and 3.3.4 does not properly handle URLs in which URL encoding is used for path separators, which allows remote attackers to read script source code or conduct directory traversal attacks and execute unintended code via a crafted character sequence, as demonstrated by a %2f separator. Published: February 20, 2020; 12:15:12 PM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 9.8 CRITICAL V2.0: 7.5 HIGH |
CVE-2019-9674 |
Lib/zipfile.py in Python through 3.7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a ZIP bomb. Published: February 04, 2020; 10:15:11 AM -0500 |
V4.0:(not available) V3.1: 7.5 HIGH V2.0: 5.0 MEDIUM |