The Zone-Based Firewall implementation in Cisco IOS 15.4(2)T3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted network traffic that triggers incorrect kernel-timer handling, aka Bug ID CSCuh25672.

The Network-Based Application Recognition (NBAR) protocol implementation in Cisco IOS 15.3(100)M and earlier on Cisco 2900 Integrated Services Router (aka Cisco Internet Router) devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NBAR process hang) via IPv4 packets, aka Bug ID CSCuo73682.

The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) implementation in Cisco IOS 15.3(3)S and earlier and IOS XE does not properly validate parameters in ITR control messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CEF outage and packet drops) via malformed messages, aka Bug ID CSCun73782.

Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)S allows remote attackers to bypass interface ACL restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending IPv6 packets in an unspecified scenario in which expected packet drops do not occur for "a small percentage" of the packets, aka Bug ID CSCty73682.

Cisco IOS Unified Border Element (CUBE) in Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)T allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (input queue wedge) via a crafted series of RTCP packets, aka Bug ID CSCuc42518.

Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)T on AS5400 devices allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (spurious errors) via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCub61009.

Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)T, when scansafe is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (latency) via SYN packets that are not accompanied by SYN-ACK packets from the Scan Safe Tower, aka Bug ID CSCub85451.

Cisco IOS before 15.3(1)T on Cisco 2900 devices, when a VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 card is configured for TDM/HDLC mode, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (serial-interface outage) via certain Frame Relay traffic, aka Bug ID CSCub13317.

The IKE implementation in Cisco IOS 15.4(1)T and earlier and IOS XE allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (security-association drop) via crafted Main Mode packets, aka Bug ID CSCun31021.

The MLDP implementation in Cisco IOS 15.3(3)S and earlier on 7600 routers, when many VRFs are configured, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (chunk corruption and device reload) by establishing many multicast flows, aka Bug ID CSCue22345.

The SSL VPN implementation in Cisco IOS 15.3(1)T2 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (interface queue wedge) via crafted DTLS packets in an SSL session, aka Bug IDs CSCuh97409 and CSCud90568.

The Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) implementation in unspecified Cisco products and other vendors' products, as used in WPA and WPA2 on Wi-Fi networks, has insufficient countermeasures against certain crafted and replayed packets, which makes it easier for remote attackers to decrypt packets from an access point (AP) to a client and spoof packets from an AP to a client, and conduct ARP poisoning attacks or other attacks, as demonstrated by tkiptun-ng.

Unspecified vulnerability in the VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) implementation on Cisco IOS and CatOS, when the VTP operating mode is not transparent, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or hang) via a crafted VTP packet sent to a switch interface configured as a trunk port.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco IOS allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML, and execute IOS commands, via unspecified vectors, aka PSIRT-2022590358. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Command EXEC in Cisco IOS allow local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors, aka (1) PSIRT-0474975756 and (2) PSIRT-0388256465. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.

Unspecified vulnerability in Command EXEC in Cisco IOS allows local users to bypass command restrictions and obtain sensitive information via an unspecified "variation of an IOS command" involving "two different methods", aka CSCsk16129. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.

Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS allows remote attackers to obtain the IOS version via unspecified vectors involving a "common network service", aka PSIRT-1255024833. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.

Off-by-one error in Cisco IOS allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger a heap-based buffer overflow. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.

Integer overflow in Cisco IOS allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.

Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected.