Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) in HP-UX B.11.11, B.11.23, and B.11.31, and SMH before 2.1.10 for Linux and Windows, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in news_page.php in SnewsCMS Rus 2.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the page_id parameter.

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ELSEIF CMS Beta 0.6 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) repertimage parameter to utilisateurs/vousetesbannis.php, the (2) elseifvotetxtresultatduvote parameter to utilisateurs/votesresultats.php, and the (3) elseifforumtxtmenugeneraleduforum parameter to moduleajouter/depot/adminforum.php.

Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in ELSEIF CMS Beta 0.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the (1) contenus parameter to (a) contenus.php; the (2) tpelseifportalrepertoire parameter to (b) votes.php, (c) espaceperso.php, (d) enregistrement.php, (e) commentaire.php, and (f) coeurusr.php in utilisateurs/, and (g) articles/fonctions.php and (h) depot/fonctions.php in moduleajouter/; the (3) corpsdesign parameter to (i) articles/usrarticles.php and (j) depot/usrdepot.php in moduleajouter/; and possibly other files.

ELSEIF CMS Beta 0.6 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (full path) via unspecified vectors to utilisateurs/votesresultats.php.

ELSEIF CMS Beta 0.6 does not properly unset variables when the input data includes a numeric parameter with a value matching an alphanumeric parameter's hash value, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by uploading a .php file via externe/swfupload/upload.php. NOTE: it could be argued that this vulnerability is due to a bug in the unset PHP command (CVE-2006-3017) and the proper fix should be in PHP; if so, then this should not be treated as a vulnerability in ELSEIF CMS.

SQL injection vulnerability in galerie.php in PHP Homepage M (phpHPm) 1.0, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a show action.

Heap-based buffer overflow in ConeXware PowerArchiver before 10.20.21 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a BlackHole archive.

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in messages.jsp in AppFuse before 2.0 Final allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified input that is recorded in (1) success or (2) error messages.

The Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) in the Hitachi Cosminexus Developer's Kit for Java in various Hitachi Cosminexus 7.5 products before 07-50-01, when using JSSE for SSL/TLS support, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via certain SSL/TLS handshake requests. NOTE: this may be the same as CVE-2007-3698.

Hitachi Cosminexus Agent 03-00 through 03-05, and Cosminexus Library Standard and Web Edition 04-00 and 04-01, might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (agent process crash) via invalid data from clients other than Cosminexus Manager.

The TSC Domain Manager in Hitachi TPBroker Object Transaction Monitor and Cosminexus TPBroker Object Transaction Monitor 01-00 through 03-00 might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via invalid messages.

Unspecified vulnerability in the Boost module before 4.7.x-1.0, and 5.x before 5.x-1.0, for Drupal allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files, and conduct cross-site scripting attacks (XSS) via unspecified vectors.

Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Trionic Cite CMS 1.2 rev9 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the bField[bf_data] parameter to (1) interface/editors/-custom.php or (2) interface/editors/custom.php.

SQL injection vulnerability in kategori.asp in Furkan Tastan Blog allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a goster kat action.

Sun Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in JDK and JRE 6 Update 2 and earlier, JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 12 and earlier, SDK and JRE 1.4.2_15 and earlier, and SDK and JRE 1.3.1_20 and earlier, when an HTTP proxy server is used, allows remote attackers to violate the security model for an applet's outbound connections via a multi-pin DNS rebinding attack in which the applet download relies on DNS resolution on the proxy server, but the applet's socket operations rely on DNS resolution on the local machine, a different issue than CVE-2007-5274. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2007-5232.

Sun Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in JDK and JRE 6 Update 2 and earlier, JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 12 and earlier, SDK and JRE 1.4.2_15 and earlier, and SDK and JRE 1.3.1_20 and earlier, when Firefox or Opera is used, allows remote attackers to violate the security model for JavaScript outbound connections via a multi-pin DNS rebinding attack dependent on the LiveConnect API, in which JavaScript download relies on DNS resolution by the browser, but JavaScript socket operations rely on separate DNS resolution by a Java Virtual Machine (JVM), a different issue than CVE-2007-5273. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2007-5232.

The Adobe Macromedia Flash 9 plug-in allows remote attackers to cause a victim machine to establish TCP sessions with arbitrary hosts via a Flash (SWF) movie, related to lack of pinning of a hostname to a single IP address after receiving an allow-access-from element in a cross-domain-policy XML document, and the availability of a Flash Socket class that does not use the browser's DNS pins, aka DNS rebinding attacks, a different issue than CVE-2002-1467 and CVE-2007-4324.

Opera 9 drops DNS pins based on failed connections to irrelevant TCP ports, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks, as demonstrated by a port 81 URL in an IMG SRC, when the DNS pin had been established for a session on port 80.

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 drops DNS pins based on failed connections to irrelevant TCP ports, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks, as demonstrated by a port 81 URL in an IMG SRC, when the DNS pin had been established for a session on port 80, a different issue than CVE-2006-4560.